The folks at RealClimate post a very interesting piece on the extreme weather attribution question, prompted by the recent Nature editorial on the same question.
"Nature has an interesting editorial this week on the state of the science for attributing extreme events. This was prompted by a workshop in Oxford last week where, presumably, strategies, observations and results were discussed by a collection of scientists interested in the topic (including Myles Allen, Peter Stott and other familiar names). Rather less usual was a discussion, referred to in the Nature piece, on whether the whole endeavour was scientifically worthwhile, and even if it was, whether it was of any use to anyone. ...
Keep reading at:
http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2012/09/why-bother-trying-to-attribute-extreme-events/
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment